Google Search

Showing posts with label Heads. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heads. Show all posts

Monday, June 11, 2012

Obama Heads West for Dollars and Thanks From Gay Supporters

Only weeks ago, a gay rights gala in Los Angeles on Wednesday night loomed on President Obama’s calendar as a reminder of his awkward “evolving” but still-unsupportive stance on same-sex marriage. But then he came out in favor of the change, and now Mr. Obama heads west to collect the kudos — and dollars — of a galvanized gay community.

Chad Griffin, the incoming president of the Human Rights Campaign and a co-chairman of the gala, said that “even prior to Obama coming out for gay marriage, there was this grand contrast” between him and his Republican rival, the former Massachusetts governor, Mitt Romney, who favors amending the Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.

“But once the president came out in favor of marriage equality, I mean the passion and excitement was really unleashed,” Mr. Griffin said. “Now there’s no cloud over that support. An already enthusiastic base has been further motivated, further excited and further mobilized.”

The annual fund-raising dinner of the LGBT Leadership Council, which Mr. Obama formed in 2007 for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender supporters as his first presidential campaign got under way, had to be moved from the site initially chosen for the gala to the larger Beverly Wilshire hotel, to accommodate the increased demand. Tickets for the gala sold out, as did far more expensive ones for a private dinner that follows the event.

According to the Obama campaign, about 600 people paid at least $1,250 each to attend the gala, which will feature television star Ellen DeGeneres and a performance by Darren Criss, who plays an openly gay high school student in the TV show “Glee.” Mr. Criss is a last-minute replacement for the rock singer Pink, who had to cancel due to illness, organizers said.

For $2,500, an attendee receives preferred seating; for $10,000 a photo with Mr. Obama; and for $25,000 a couple, inclusion in a reception. After the gala, about 70 people — individuals who paid $25,000 and couples who paid $40,000 — are expected to join Mr. Obama for dinner at the Los Angeles home of “Glee” creator and gay rights activist Ryan Murphy and his fiancĂ©, David Miller.

The Los Angeles events occur less than a month after Mr. Obama was in the city for a fund-raising dinner at the home of actor George Clooney that raised an estimated $15 million — the day after the president had announced his personal support for a same-sex marriage in a television interview.

The timing was coincidental. While aides say Mr. Obama decided in January to declare his support for marriage equality before the election, his timetable was hastened when Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., in a television interview, offered his fulsome endorsement for people of the same sex to marry and enjoy the same rights and privileges accorded to married heterosexual couples.

Before Mr. Obama flew to Los Angeles on Wednesday, he first went to San Francisco for two fund-raisers. First he attended a private discussion with 25 donors from the technology field who paid $35,800, and then spoke to a fund-raising luncheon crowd of about 250 people who paid $5,000 each.

There, in a dark wood-paneled ballroom, Mr. Obama was introduced by former professional baseball star Willie Mays, now elderly enough to require assistance mounting the stairs but energetic in recalling his disbelief that an African-American was elected president.

With a few protesters out of sight and earshot on the street below — including environmentalists, two dressed as polar bears protesting against Shell Oil’s drilling in the Arctic, and several people holding Romney signs — the president delivered his standard campaign stump speech extolling more than two years of jobs growth but acknowledging “a lot of people are still hurting out there.”

While Republicans regularly mock Mr. Obama’s 2008 campaign slogan, the president told his supporters of the 2012 election, “It’s still about hope and change.”

Change, he said, has included the Lilly Ledbetter law making it easier for women to challenge unfair pay scales; a revival of the manufacturing sector, especially in automaking and clean energy; expanded health insurance coverage, including provisions for young adults to remain longer on their parents’ policies and guaranteeing insurance for people once rejected for having pre-existing medical conditions, and the killing of Osama bin Laden and weakening of Al Qaeda.

But Mr. Obama drew the most cheers and applause when he referred to expanded coverage of women’s reproductive health services and repeal of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law against openly gay people in the military.

As is usual for Mr. Obama’s fund-raisers, the proceeds of the California events benefit his campaign, the Democratic National Committee and some state Democratic Party organizations. The president has been a frequent flier to California and New York, which he will visit yet again next week, not to campaign for votes (both states are reliably Democratic) but to raise money. Indeed, Mr. Obama’s financial support from liberal Hollywood and Silicon Valley figures has helped to make up for diminished contributions from Wall Street since 2008.

On Thursday, before he leaves California, Mr. Obama will go to a breakfast fund-raiser at a private residence near Los Angeles. According to his campaign, about 300 people paid at least $2,500 each to join him. Then the president is off to Nevada, a crucial swing state in the election, for the only “official” event of his latest Western jaunt.

In Las Vegas, Mr. Obama once again will address the rising costs of college education, an issue that he and Democrats in Congress have emphasized lately in part to appeal to younger voters, whose support is considered essential to Democrats’ victories in November.


View the original article here

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Arizona Immigration Bill Heads for Supreme Court

Russell Pearce, a Republican who is the former president of the Arizona Senate, ventured into hostile terrain in a hearing called by Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, who is chairman of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on immigration. Gov. Jan Brewer of Arizona, also a Republican, turned down Mr. Schumer’s invitation to advocate for the law at the hearing.

Mr. Pearce and Ms. Brewer are in Washington to attend a Supreme Court hearing on Wednesday in which the justices will consider whether four provisions of the law that have been challenged by the Obama administration are unconstitutional because they encroach on legal terrain reserved for the federal government.

Mr. Pearce, known for his blunt language, said the law, SB 1070, would protect the state’s citizens from “the invasion of illegal aliens we face today,” which he called “one of the greatest threats to our nation.” He said Arizona had acted because “the federal government has decided not to enforce the law,” and he accused the administration of “encouraging further lawbreaking” with its lawsuit.

The Senate hearing served primarily to highlight the political jockeying surrounding the Supreme Court’s deliberations, as Democrats and Republicans try to gauge the possible impact of a ruling by the justices on Latinos, a pivotal group of voters in the presidential contest.

As it appears increasingly possible that the court will uphold at least some of the disputed provisions, Mr. Schumer called the hearing as a showcase for the Democrats’ opposition to the law, which has been intensely unpopular among Latinos nationwide. He announced that if the Supreme Court upheld part or all of Arizona’s statute in its ruling, which is expected in June, he would introduce a bill to expressly prevent states from enacting their own immigration enforcement laws.

Senate staff members said that proposal would have little chance of passage, but it could serve as a rallying point for Democrats to appeal to Latino voters during the summer as the presidential race is fully under way.

None of the Republicans on the subcommittee attended the hearing.

“It is no more than election-year theater,” said Senator John Cornyn of Texas, the senior Republican on the subcommittee. He said that none of the witnesses was an expert on the arcane legal issues that the Supreme Court is considering about the law.

The Arizona law requires state law enforcement officials to determine the immigration status of people they stop or arrest if officials have reason to believe they might be illegal immigrants. The law also makes it a crime under state law for immigrants to fail to register under a federal law and for illegal immigrants to work or to try to find work. It also allows the police to make arrests without warrants if they have probable cause to believe that suspects are deportable under federal law.

Lower courts have blocked the provisions. The administration has argued to the Supreme Court that the law conflicts with federal policies and priorities. Arizona counters that the law complements federal efforts to control immigration and is a routine example of state enforcement of federal laws.

Mr. Pearce, a fierce opponent of illegal immigration, wrote the statute, which passed in 2010. Caught in the uproar the law provoked among some voters, especially Latinos, he lost his Senate seat in a recall election last November.

Persistent questioning from Mr. Schumer put Mr. Pearce on the defensive at times, as the senator bore down on sections of the bill he said could lead the Arizona police to engage in racial profiling. The senator pointed to a training manual showing that the police were instructed to consider how a person was dressed and whether his vehicle was “heavily loaded” in developing a “reasonable suspicion” that he was an illegal immigrant.

The bitterness that the bill has provoked was on display. Dennis DeConcini, who was a Democratic United States senator from Arizona from 1977 to 1995, issued an apology to Latinos for the “harm” of the law. “I am embarrassed for my state,” he said.

Around the country, immigrant advocate organizations were gearing up for protests and vigils. Immigrant groups in Los Angeles held a small rally on Tuesday in front of a federal court building downtown.

In a letter released Tuesday afternoon, religious leaders from a number of faiths called on President Obama to “reassert your authority” to stop states from enacting a patchwork of immigration laws, by working with Congress to pass a broad federal overhaul of the immigration system. Among those signing were Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan of New York, president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops; Leith Anderson, president of the National Association of Evangelicals; and the Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference.

Adam Liptak contributed reporting.


View the original article here