Google Search

Showing posts with label victims. Show all posts
Showing posts with label victims. Show all posts

Saturday, August 30, 2014

Prosecutors just one part of the story, along with victims, conduct of defense <nbsp/>

(PNI) Regarding the prosecutorial- misconduct series, "The Gray Area of Courtroom Conduct."

There are three sides to any capital-case story: the prosecution, the defense and the victim/victim's family. We spent five years of hearings and two months in a trial with Maricopa County prosecutor Juan Martinez during my sister's murder-trial case (State vs. Dixon) and never saw prosecutorial misconduct.

Yet we saw multiple instances of defense manipulation, including delays, frivolous motions, etc., all of which were painful for the family of the victim.

The series is comprehensive, but the other two sides of the story should be explored and told.

--Leslie James, Phoenix

Montgomery driven by politics

I thoroughly enjoyed your special report on prosecutors who cross the line.

The larger point I took from the story was Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery's lack of accountability with regard to all the misconduct in his office. When he does learn of it, he treats it as if it is of little concern.

He is too busy chasing his ideology to manage his own office. He is the most political prosecutor we have seen here in a long time. It's time he gives up chasing ghosts and do his job as county attorney.

--Bill Acree, Phoenix

Kochs are good for Democrats

Columnist Doug MacEachern ("For liberals, Kochs are evil personified," Oct. 28) claims liberals demonize the Koch brothers.

Ironically, the Kochs are the best thing to happen to the Democratic Party in decades.

They have dumped huge amounts of cash into the "tea party" movement, and their radical notions have alienated moderates and split the GOP in two.

The tea party basks in righteous indignation and a negative, confrontational style.

That approach works well with older voters and in the red states, but it alienates most Americans and nearly guarantees Democratic presidential victories in the next several elections.

Despite the worship of Ronald Reagan, the GOP has missed his most critical message. Reagan was a great president because he made us feel good about ourselves.

Not because he lowered taxes or made the government smaller. His sincerity and honesty brought people together rather than driving them apart.

Reagan was a pragmatist and resolutely committed to success.

He never would have condoned the tea party's quixotic quest to repeal "Obamacare" 40 times! It only serves to illustrate how powerless the tea party is.

--M.L. Frischenmeyer,Chandler

Health law is a godsend to me

Although I did have problems accessing healthcare.gov early on, in about the second week of October, I was able to access information regarding what plans at each company were available to me.

Once I decided which company and which plan I wanted, I contacted a company representative directly to sign up. My experience was very positive, and the process easy.

I've been buying my own health insurance for almost 14years, and I can tell you the Affordable Care Act, even with all the rollout problems, is a godsend!

Although I do have a pre-existing condition, (I'm sure almost everyone over 45 has one), I'm healthy and only need to see my doctor for annual checkups.

For 14years, I've struggled almost every year to remain insured.

My last coverage was going to cost me about $1,300 per month just for myself. Under the Affordable Care Act, my insurance will cost me $575, my policy is much better and my deductible is lower.

For anyone who will ever have to buy his or her own insurance, you can thank the Affordable Care Act for making it even possible.

--David Johnson, Mesa

Cartoon open to interpretation

Steve Benson's cartoon Sunday shows a serpent and a sleeping baby. It's no surprise the baby is "Obamacare" and the serpent is the GOP.

I think many people who are demonized by the left feel the cartoon should be just the opposite. The snake is Obamacare, and the baby represents average American taxpaying citizens who have families and small businesses.

It could also be taken a step further with the serpent just titled "Big (out of control) Government." Labels for the cartoon are numerous. Pro-lifers see the snake as abortion, with the baby representing, well, a baby. You get the idea.

--Charles Lopresto, Phoenix

Copyright 2013 The Arizona Republic|azcentral.com. All rights reserved.For more information about reprints & permissions, visit our FAQ's. To report corrections and clarifications, contact Standards Editor Brent Jones. For publication consideration in the newspaper, send comments to letters@usatoday.com. Include name, phone number, city and state for verification. To view our corrections, go to corrections.usatoday.com.

Posted


View the original article here

Monday, November 11, 2013

Prosecutors just one part of the story, along with victims, conduct of defense <nbsp/>

(PNI) Regarding the prosecutorial- misconduct series, "The Gray Area of Courtroom Conduct."

There are three sides to any capital-case story: the prosecution, the defense and the victim/victim's family. We spent five years of hearings and two months in a trial with Maricopa County prosecutor Juan Martinez during my sister's murder-trial case (State vs. Dixon) and never saw prosecutorial misconduct.

Yet we saw multiple instances of defense manipulation, including delays, frivolous motions, etc., all of which were painful for the family of the victim.

The series is comprehensive, but the other two sides of the story should be explored and told.

--Leslie James, Phoenix

Montgomery driven by politics

I thoroughly enjoyed your special report on prosecutors who cross the line.

The larger point I took from the story was Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery's lack of accountability with regard to all the misconduct in his office. When he does learn of it, he treats it as if it is of little concern.

He is too busy chasing his ideology to manage his own office. He is the most political prosecutor we have seen here in a long time. It's time he gives up chasing ghosts and do his job as county attorney.

--Bill Acree, Phoenix

Kochs are good for Democrats

Columnist Doug MacEachern ("For liberals, Kochs are evil personified," Oct. 28) claims liberals demonize the Koch brothers.

Ironically, the Kochs are the best thing to happen to the Democratic Party in decades.

They have dumped huge amounts of cash into the "tea party" movement, and their radical notions have alienated moderates and split the GOP in two.

The tea party basks in righteous indignation and a negative, confrontational style.

That approach works well with older voters and in the red states, but it alienates most Americans and nearly guarantees Democratic presidential victories in the next several elections.

Despite the worship of Ronald Reagan, the GOP has missed his most critical message. Reagan was a great president because he made us feel good about ourselves.

Not because he lowered taxes or made the government smaller. His sincerity and honesty brought people together rather than driving them apart.

Reagan was a pragmatist and resolutely committed to success.

He never would have condoned the tea party's quixotic quest to repeal "Obamacare" 40 times! It only serves to illustrate how powerless the tea party is.

--M.L. Frischenmeyer,Chandler

Health law is a godsend to me

Although I did have problems accessing healthcare.gov early on, in about the second week of October, I was able to access information regarding what plans at each company were available to me.

Once I decided which company and which plan I wanted, I contacted a company representative directly to sign up. My experience was very positive, and the process easy.

I've been buying my own health insurance for almost 14years, and I can tell you the Affordable Care Act, even with all the rollout problems, is a godsend!

Although I do have a pre-existing condition, (I'm sure almost everyone over 45 has one), I'm healthy and only need to see my doctor for annual checkups.

For 14years, I've struggled almost every year to remain insured.

My last coverage was going to cost me about $1,300 per month just for myself. Under the Affordable Care Act, my insurance will cost me $575, my policy is much better and my deductible is lower.

For anyone who will ever have to buy his or her own insurance, you can thank the Affordable Care Act for making it even possible.

--David Johnson, Mesa

Cartoon open to interpretation

Steve Benson's cartoon Sunday shows a serpent and a sleeping baby. It's no surprise the baby is "Obamacare" and the serpent is the GOP.

I think many people who are demonized by the left feel the cartoon should be just the opposite. The snake is Obamacare, and the baby represents average American taxpaying citizens who have families and small businesses.

It could also be taken a step further with the serpent just titled "Big (out of control) Government." Labels for the cartoon are numerous. Pro-lifers see the snake as abortion, with the baby representing, well, a baby. You get the idea.

--Charles Lopresto, Phoenix

Copyright 2013 The Arizona Republic|azcentral.com. All rights reserved.For more information about reprints & permissions, visit our FAQ's. To report corrections and clarifications, contact Standards Editor Brent Jones. For publication consideration in the newspaper, send comments to letters@usatoday.com. Include name, phone number, city and state for verification. To view our corrections, go to corrections.usatoday.com.

Posted


View the original article here

Saturday, April 21, 2012

Thomas and Patterson relish roles as victims

Tuesday was quite the day for victims around this place.

RESPONSE: Patterson tells ethics panel he wants to question witnesses and put up a defense. B3

First, there was former Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas, reprising the role of Delusional Crusader against Corruption, Doomed to be Squashed by the Shadowy Powers That Be.

"The political witch hunt that's just ended ? (sends) a chilling message to prosecutors," Thomas proclaimed, as news of his disbarment exploded. "Those who take on the powerful will lose their livelihood."

Especially, I would add, when those who take on the powerful don't seem to go in search of actual evidence before filing RICO suits and criminal charges and such.

Then there's my favorite victim of the moment, Rep. Daniel "Who me?" Patterson, the perpetually picked-upon Democrat turned independent, who on Tuesday offered an answer for every allegation, every charge, every accusation lobbed at him by his ex-wife, by his ex-girlfriend, by police, by prosecutors, by his colleagues.

Short version: They're all lying and the investigators who are calling for his expulsion are biased.

"The whole process is unfair and has turned into a witch hunt," he wrote in Tuesday's Arizona Republic.

There are, of course, differences between our two victims in the scope, the breadth and the sheer magnitude of their transgressions. But the starkest difference is this: Thomas got his day in court, so to speak, before a disciplinary panel yanked away his profession.

Patterson, it seems, will not, unless the House ethics chairman, Ted Vogt, R-Tucson, has a change of heart.

House Minority Leader Chad Campbell, D-Phoenix, on Tuesday reversed course and said he now believes that Patterson should get a hearing.

"You're right," he told me. "Let's have some very pointed questions from the Ethics Committee and get a response."

Patterson's troubles tumbled into view in late February when he got into a fight with his girlfriend. Unfortunately for him, the fight was witnessed by a city of Tucson parks employee, who told police that Patterson "backhanded" the woman, knocking her to the ground.

House Democrats immediately swung into action, something you get the feeling they'd been itching to do since 2010 when allegations first surfaced that he'd beaten up his then-wife. The resulting ethics complaint was signed by nearly every Democrat in the joint.

Investigators, assigned to check out the complaint, painted a picture of a bully feared by colleagues and ex-wives/girlfriends alike, though his ex-girlfriend has since recanted. They found "substantial and significant evidence of Rep. Patterson's dishonest, inappropriate, unprofessional, indecorous conduct" and recommended that he be bounced, posthaste.

Alas, if you expect Patterson to go gentle into that good night, you're dreaming. In Pattersonland, he is perhaps the only innocent around. And so we have his bizarre 30-page response delivered on Tuesday, along with 600 assorted pages of backup material that appears irrelevant.

The ethics complaint, he says, is bogus. If he did scream at his colleagues, as a fair number of them say, he's apologized and so double jeopardy would apply if they now tried to remove him. Besides, he now has a "cordial relationship" with these people.

Even, presumably, with the ones who are carrying guns because they're afraid of him.

Though he did write a letter to his alma mater Michigan State on legislative letterhead, requesting signed basketball memorabilia, he says, "I never intended to use my position to get anything inappropriate."

At one point in his response, he blames his predicament on "racial discrimination" by Democratic Party leaders. At another, he lauds the notion of "Baja Arizona" seceding from state because Republicans are "plundering" the place.

And if people really do feel threatened by him? Well, there's someone to blame for that (and here's a hint, it's not him).

"If people are frightened of Rep. Patterson physically then perhaps we should see what the written policy and procedures are for handling such occasion, the training personnel receive on sexual harassment, discrimination and duty to ensure a safe work place," he wrote. "If the allegations in the investigative report are true, then the state of Arizona has failed miserably in its legal obligations to follow written procedures."

So, to recap. Nothing is Patterson's fault. He is a victim extraordinaire -- of his exes, of his colleagues, of both political parties, the police, prosecutors and -- wait for it -- the state of Arizona, which apparently didn't give him proper training on sexual harassment.

The man sounds desperate and vaguely unhinged. But he's also right, at least on one thing.

Like Thomas, he deserves a fair hearing, even if it's only the chance to stand before theEthics Committee, one eyeball-to-eyeball opportunity to plead his case before his fate is sealed.

Nobody likes a bully, after all. And the worst sort of bully is a mob.

Reach Roberts at laurie.roberts@arizonarepublic.com or 602-444-8635.

Copyright 2012 The Arizona Republic|azcentral.com. All rights reserved.For more information about reprints & permissions, visit our FAQ's. To report corrections and clarifications, contact Standards Editor Brent Jones. For publication consideration in the newspaper, send comments to letters@usatoday.com. Include name, phone number, city and state for verification. To view our corrections, go to corrections.usatoday.com.

Posted


View the original article here