Google Search

Showing posts with label White. Show all posts
Showing posts with label White. Show all posts

Sunday, July 8, 2012

Column: Enthusiasm of black vote key to White House

NEW ORLEANS – Valerie Jarrett knew she was walking a tightrope when she met here with a small group of black columnists.

Jarrett: Senior adviser to Obama. AP

Jarrett: Senior adviser to Obama.

AP

Jarrett: Senior adviser to Obama.

DeWayne Wickham USATODAY columnist

A senior adviser to the president, she was in the Big Easy to wave the Obama administration's flag at the annual gathering of the National Association of Black Journalists. The convention is a way station for presidents, Oval Office seekers and their surrogates. At the group's awards dinner Saturday night, Jarrett touted her boss' accomplishments and decried Republican obstructionism that has kept Obama from getting more done.

Earlier that day, in a meeting with members of the Trotter Group, an organization of black columnists, she was peppered with a broad range of questions about the president's handling of issues from the environment to foreign trade. But the question she had to know was coming — the one that put her on the tightrope — was about race.

Facing the question

The race question first started dogging Obama in 2008, when he went from an also-ran to a serious presidential contender. Back then, while some blacks asked whether Obama, raised by his white mother and grandparents, was black enough, some whites questioned whether his connection to the controversial Rev. Jeremiah Wright made him too black.

More than three years after becoming this nation's first black president, race still haunts his presidency. Outraged by his presence in the White House, a surprising number of white public figures have treated him with great disrespect. Republican radio host Barbara Espinosa recently called him a "monkey"; conservative commentator Pat Buchanan referred to him as a "boy," a term widely used during the Jim Crow era to emasculate black men.

So, it's not surprising that Jarrett winced a bit when the race question came up. Asked whether Obama could turn around his declining support among white voters, she said: "He views everybody as getable. He's going to work hard to persuade everybody that where he's trying to move the nation is the right direction."

Needs broad coalition

Obama's best path to re-election is to recreate the broad coalition of voters that swept him to victory in 2008. But this time, that might not be good enough without a significant increase in black voter turnout in the swing states of Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Ohio, Michigan and Pennsylvania.

To do this, Obama supporters need to unabashedly trumpet what the president has done for blacks — such as increased funding for education, universal health care, and a sharp reduction in the sentencing disparity for possession of crack cocaine instead of powder, all things that Jarrett said have disproportionately benefited them. And to drive black voters to turn out in record numbers on Election Day, the president's supporters must work blacks into a frenzy by harping on the disrespect and racist comments that have been heaped upon Obama by right-wingers.

Understandably, Jarrett doesn't want to stir the racial cauldron. But if Obama is going to get the black turnout he needs, somebody's got to constantly remind them of the race-baiting language supporters of Republican Mitt Romney are using to mine votes for him.

The truth is that for Obama, some voters are not "getable." The presence of a black president in the White House is an immutable offense to a hard core of Obama's opponents. To overcome this racism hurdle, the president's re-election campaign must find a way to get blacks — the Democratic Party's most loyal constituency — to the polls in droves on Election Day.

DeWayne Wickham writes on Tuesdays for USA TODAY.

For more information about reprints & permissions, visit our FAQ's. To report corrections and clarifications, contact Standards Editor Brent Jones. For publication consideration in the newspaper, send comments to letters@usatoday.com. Include name, phone number, city and state for verification. To view our corrections, go to corrections.usatoday.com.

View the original article here

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Democrats to the White Working Class -- Drop Dead (ContributorNetwork)

COMMENTARY | A recent piece in the New York Times suggests the Democratic Party is preparing to toss working class whites, who have been part of the winning coalition for the Democrats since Franklin Roosevelt, under the bus.

The new coalition for the Democratic Party will consist of educated elites that will include "professors, artists, designers, editors, human resources managers, lawyers, librarians, social workers, teachers and therapists" and poorer voters, primarily blacks and Hispanics. Working class whites have long be alienated from the Democrats since the phenomenon of the "Reagan Democrats," who switched to the Republican Party in the 1980s. Democrats lost this demographic group by 30 percent and more in the 2010 midterms.

The educated elites will be bought off with the support of rights to self expression, abortion, gay marriage and a leftward tilt on the environment and defense policy. The less affluent minorities will be bought off by new social spending and government assistance.

While the Democrats hope to hold their losses among working American whites down, one wonders how that could be accomplished if the sense grows that working people have been abandoned. Someone has to pay for all of that social spending that will benefit the poor, after all. Working whites also remain skeptical of government sanctioned hedonism, environmental regulations that stifle jobs, and cuts in defense spending that invite aggression from America's enemies.

Rush Limbaugh, the radio talk show host never slow to pick up on a political trend, suggested the Democrats are saying, on his Monday, broadcast, "If you work, we don't want you."

In a way, the new Democratic election strategy is a reaction to the tea party movement, which has risen from discontented working and middle class people who feel that their government has become too big and too intrusive. Instead of listening to the complaints of the tea party and adjusting their agenda to attract tea party voters, the Democrats have done the equivalent of extending them the middle finger. Instead they have embraced the Occupy Wall Street crowd, which is crying out for government handouts and entitlements.

This is a dangerous strategy. The tea party, consisting as it does of people who work and make the country run, are more numerous and more organized than the constituencies the Democrats are embracing. Thus the Democratic Party might have considered itself to permanent minority status.


View the original article here

Saturday, June 25, 2011

White House Swaps Applause for Laughter at Obama's Job Boast (The Atlantic Wire)

Attention conservative blogosphere: the White House would like to set the record straight about a little parenthetical in a recent transcript. Late yesterday, you see, the White House posted Obama's recent remarks to the Democratic National Committee, which included this line: "Over the last 15 months we've created over 2.1 million private sector jobs. (Laughter.)."

Related: New Poll Puts Obama's Job Approval Up 11 Points, But Will It Last?

Related: President Obama Magically Silences a Crying Baby

Conservative bloggers, of course, had a field day. The Drudge Report has been running the excerpt as an above-the-fold headline for much of the day. Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit chose the headline, "Wow. Even DNC Donors Break Out in Laughter When Obama Claims He Created Jobs," adding, "For the record… The country has lost 2.5 million jobs since he moved into the White House. Maybe that's why they were laughing?" Kerry Pickett at The Washington Times was a bit more forgiving, hypothesizing that "those watching the closed captioned text of the speech on television sets saw a laugh cue instead of an applause cue." To be sure, Pickett added, "the president isn't laughing, but Republicans and other critics of his private sector job creation claims sure are."

Related: The Behind-the-Scenes Moments of the Bin Laden Raid

Mistake or not, the White House moved to correct the record. A little after 4 PM EST, it sent out a "corrected" version of the transcript to the White House press list, striking out "laughter" and replacing it with "applause." Will the bloggers buy it?

Related: Obama Decides Against Releasing Bin Laden Photos

Related: What the Navy SEAL Helmet Cams Saw During the Bin Laden Raid

Want to add to this story? Open Wire.


View the original article here