Christie Challenged by N.J. Democrats’ Pitch for Higher Wage - Businessweek

February 27, 2012, 1:34 PM EST By Elise Young

(Adds comments from hearing beginning in 14th paragraph.)

Feb. 23 (Bloomberg) -- New Jersey Democrats, less than a week after Republican Governor Chris Christie vetoed their bill to make same-sex marriage legal, are pushing another priority, a higher minimum wage.

New Jersey would join at least eight U.S. states raising the minimum hourly wage for most workers this year. A bill lawmakers are considering today would boost the rate to $8.50 an hour from $7.25 starting in July, and starting next year would tie future increases to U.S. Consumer Price Index changes.

Democrats, who control both legislative chambers, put a priority this year on the wage issue, same-sex marriage and a tax increase for millionaires. Christie, 49 and in his first term, rejected the marriage bill Feb. 17 and yesterday stood fast in opposing higher taxes on the wealthy. The governor said last month he would consider a higher minimum pay rate, while saying job growth was more important, even $7.25-an-hour jobs.

“I am not yet focused on the minimum-wage situation and what we may or may not do,” Christie told reporters yesterday in Palisades Park. “One thing I can guarantee you of is that nothing will be done unless I’m a player at the table to discuss it.”

“So far, the Democrats have just decided to operate on their own,” the governor said. “We’ve seen this before -- when they operate on their own, things get vetoed.”

Agenda Key

A higher minimum wage “should be a key part of the economic recovery agenda,” said Tom Hester, a spokesman for Assembly Speaker Sheila Oliver, a Democrat from East Orange who sponsored the bill to raise the rate.

“The governor is more than welcome to join this debate with the goal of helping families struggling to get by in these difficult times,” Hester said yesterday by e-mail.

Christie on Feb. 21 introduced a $32.1 billion budget that relies on a 7.3 percent rise in revenue in fiscal 2013, which begins in July. That would be the biggest gain since 2007 and would help pay for his personal and business income-tax cuts and the largest public-pension contribution in state history.

Ahead of Neighbors

New Jersey residents had the third-highest income per capita among states in 2010, at $51,167, trailing only Massachusetts and Connecticut, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The Garden State’s minimum wage last increased in 2009, when it climbed 1.4 percent from $7.15.

A rate of $8.50 would put New Jersey ahead of neighboring New York, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, which all require the $7.25 federal minimum, and would edge out Connecticut, where the state-set rate is now $8.25, according to the U.S. Labor Department’s website. The Assembly’s Labor Committee will hear testimony today on the bill in the state Capitol in Trenton.

The New Jersey Minimum Wage Advisory Commission, a five- member appointed panel that reports annually, in January recommended in a 3-2 vote to keep the pay rate unchanged this year. The panel cited an economy still recovering from the longest recession since World War II, and a jobless rate which has been 9 percent or higher since May 2009.

An increase “may put the state at a competitive disadvantage,” leading some employers to add fewer jobs or consider moving to lower-cost states, the panel said in a report. It also cited the probable effect of pushing up consumer prices.

For the 12 months ended September 2011, an average 39,700 people in New Jersey were paid the minimum rate, according to the panel, or about 2.3 percent of all hourly wage workers.

Pros and Cons

The current minimum wage isn’t a livable standard in a high-cost state such as New Jersey, Lakisha Williams, a 29-year- old single mother from Newark, told lawmakers today.

Williams, a high-school graduate, said she earns $290 a week working full time as a wheelchair assistant at Newark Liberty International Airport. She said she receives Medicaid health coverage, rent assistance and food stamps.

“I’m the parent of a 12-year-old daughter, and she is very expensive,” Williams said.

The state should follow New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s lead, according to Jon Whiten, a spokesman for New Jersey Public Policy Perspective, a nonprofit organization in Trenton that focuses on “progressive policies,” according to its website. Bloomberg advocates a higher minimum.

“It’s actually good for the broader economic climate to ensure a basic standard of living for those who are working hard,” Whiten said yesterday by e-mail. The mayor is founder and majority owner of Bloomberg News parent Bloomberg LP.

New York

In Albany, New York Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, a Manhattan Democrat, introduced a bill last month that would raise the state’s minimum wage to $8.50 an hour and index future increases to inflation. Governor Andrew Cuomo, also a Democrat, has said he supports the concept while he hasn’t decided whether to back Silver’s bill.

Opponents such as the New Jersey Business and Industry Association, a 21,500-member lobbying group in Trenton, say it’s the wrong time for a mandated increase. For a fourth straight year, more employers reported declining sales, earnings, spending and hiring compared with those reporting gains, the organization said in a survey released in September.

Bad Timing

“We’re still struggling to get out of a recession and improve the business climate in the state,” Stefanie Riehl, an assistant vice president of employment and labor policy for the group, said by telephone.

Joe Olivo, president of Perfect Printing in Moorestown, said opponents of the increase have been demonized. He said his family has owned the company for 33 years, and that during the height of the economic slowdown in 2008 and 2009, he was forced to fire nine workers. Four of the firm’s 48 workers would get raises after a minimum-wage increase, he said.

“Everybody has their own financial difficulties at my company,” Olivo, 46, told reporters after testifying before lawmakers. “No one wants to come out against somebody and say they don’t feel they should be paid more. I don’t feel like that. I just worry this will hurt the workers they’re trying to protect and our businesses.”

Christie has voiced concern that an increase may lead employers to cut workers’ hours and put off hiring. He has said he recognizes a higher rate may be a good thing and he wants to be involved in the discussions about the policy.

“I’d love to sit down and talk to them,” said Christie, referring to Democratic leaders. “My mind is not set on this issue, but I’m not going to be persuaded in silence.”

--With assistance from Freeman Klopott in Albany, New York, and Terrence Dopp in Trenton, New Jersey. Editors: Stacie Servetah, Ted Bunker.

To contact the reporter on this story: Elise Young in Trenton at eyoung30@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Tannenbaum at mtannen@bloomberg.net

View the original article here

Christie, Democrats gear up for next round - Courier-Post

Gov. Chris Christie says the state Legislature shouldn't try to play Santa Claus with the $29.7 billion state budget. Democrats retort that doesn't mean the governor has to play Scrooge.

Christie's series of line-item vetoes hit social programs and aid for low- and middle-income communities the hardest. They even included orphans-and-widows items, such as a treatment center for abused kids.

The Democratic legislative leaders, just days after being effusively praised by Christie, a Republican, for their bipartisan cooperation in passing pension and benefit reform, were outraged.

"We're not talking about political hacks here. We're not talking about pork spending. We're not talking about special interests. We're talking about abused children," Democratic Assembly Speaker Sheila Y. Oliver of Essex County said in a statement about the treatment center cut.

State Senate President Stephen M. Sweeney, D-Gloucester, said it would be much harder to work with Christie in the future. He pointed particularly at the $46.5 million taken from Tuition Aid Grants, a college-aid program for students from low-income families. The cut was more than double the $21.3 million Democrats had added to the program.

"This is the most disappointing day I've had as a legislator," Sweeney said in a news conference. "To prove a point, (Christie) had decided to hurt people. When you see the TAG cut, that shows where he's headed."

Partisan budget dustups are de rigueur in Trenton, but this year's line-item vetoes by Christie were interpreted as a reaction to Democrats or others, such as the state Supreme Court, with whom Christie has battled.

Cuts included:

$537,000 from the Wynona M. Lipman Child Advocacy Center in Newark for abused children. A cut of some $10 million from Legal Services, which provides attorneys for low-income people after Democrats had added $5 million to the program. He also cut $200,000 from a Seton Hall law program for the poor.

$139 million from transitional aid to municipalities such as Asbury Park, Harrison, Jersey City and Chesilhurst. The action leaves only $10 million for such aid, even though some $13 million has been awarded, including $10.4 million to Asbury Park. Some of the cities will receive some $450 million more in school aid because of a state Supreme Court order in May.

A Christie spokesman early last week complained that Democrats had removed funding for a watchdog to keep tabs on the program. "Could it be to allow waste, fraud and abuse to return, allowing Democratically controlled cities to hire political hacks?" asked spokesman Michael Drewniak.

Christie had taken umbrage at many of the Democratic maneuvers, such as Democrats' estimating a $300 million savings from employee benefit reform, even though the savings from the reforms eventually approved were far less than Christie had proposed.

"It was to pay back their base and embarrass me," Christie said in a press conference Thursday where he explained his vetoes. "Now they'll play the old politics of this building. They still don't get me. I don't care. This is the right thing."

Patrick Murray of the Monmouth University Polling Institute, said that Christie's line-item vetoes smacked of tit-for-tat politics.

"This was Chris Christie saying, "if you want to play games, game on,' " Murray said in an interview. "There were things cut from this budget that did not even affect the bottom line. He did exact some revenge."

Murray said he thought that, overall, Christie was unhappy that Democrats passed an income tax surcharge on millionaires that would have raised some $600 million and corresponding legislation that would have sent $500 million to suburban school districts.

Put in the position of having to veto a tax that would have sent money back to Republican areas, Christie likely reacted, Murray said.

"It will make it difficult to work with (Democrats) again going forward. This will snowball."

Not that Christie got all he wanted. The governor's moves to limit the senior citizen property tax relief program and the Family Care health insurance program were eliminated by the Democrats. Christie's proposed changes to Medicaid resulted in a line-by-line tussle as Christie edited language in the budget over how those changes can be implemented.

View the original article here